Volume 6, Issue 4 (winter 2021)
J Health Res Commun 2021, 6(4): 15-27 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Bahmaei J, Shojaei P, Abbaszadeh M, Mohammadpour M. Challenges Affecting the Implementation of Hospital Accreditation in Iran: An Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach. J Health Res Commun 2021; 6 (4) :15-27
URL: http://jhc.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-512-en.html
URL: http://jhc.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-512-en.html
PhD Student of Healthcare Services and Management, Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract: (1902 Views)
Introduction and purpose: Accreditation is a process in which a foreign institution systematically measures and evaluates the credibility of an organization in terms of process, outcome, and structural indicators. This study aimed to identify the effective challenges in the implementation of the accreditation process and achieve a comprehensive model to improve and enhance the accreditation process.
Methods: This study was performed in two stages. In the first stage, a review of studies was conducted to identify the challenges affecting the implementation of hospital accreditation in Iran. In the second stage, the content validity method was used to recognize the most important challenges affecting the implementation of accreditation. Subsequently, to investigate the relationships among factors and determine the most effective and impressionable variables, quantitative interpretive structural modeling technique was used.
Results: The most effective variables with a driving power of 11 and dependence power of 4 were found to be the lack of necessary infrastructure, nurses, clinical staff, and other personnel; limited resources and capital; not considering the appropriate budget for the implementation of the accreditation program; and non-compliance of some standards with national and provincial conditions. On the other hand, the least influential variables on challenges affecting the implementation of hospital accreditation with a driving power of 1 were reported to be the challenge in the degree of independence, impartiality, personal judgments, and differences of evaluators' tastes, as well as the poor patient-medical team communication.
Conclusion: It is necessary to find the main and effective factors in accreditation and establish a relationship between them to achieve the more effective implementation of accreditation. Therefore, it would be possible to provide a clear framework for determining the best policies to control and manage accreditation and ultimately prevent the waste of resources in the health sector. This research provided new insights into the challenges affecting the implementation of accreditation, which identify the priorities for action in decision-making and policy-making.
Methods: This study was performed in two stages. In the first stage, a review of studies was conducted to identify the challenges affecting the implementation of hospital accreditation in Iran. In the second stage, the content validity method was used to recognize the most important challenges affecting the implementation of accreditation. Subsequently, to investigate the relationships among factors and determine the most effective and impressionable variables, quantitative interpretive structural modeling technique was used.
Results: The most effective variables with a driving power of 11 and dependence power of 4 were found to be the lack of necessary infrastructure, nurses, clinical staff, and other personnel; limited resources and capital; not considering the appropriate budget for the implementation of the accreditation program; and non-compliance of some standards with national and provincial conditions. On the other hand, the least influential variables on challenges affecting the implementation of hospital accreditation with a driving power of 1 were reported to be the challenge in the degree of independence, impartiality, personal judgments, and differences of evaluators' tastes, as well as the poor patient-medical team communication.
Conclusion: It is necessary to find the main and effective factors in accreditation and establish a relationship between them to achieve the more effective implementation of accreditation. Therefore, it would be possible to provide a clear framework for determining the best policies to control and manage accreditation and ultimately prevent the waste of resources in the health sector. This research provided new insights into the challenges affecting the implementation of accreditation, which identify the priorities for action in decision-making and policy-making.
Type of Study: Research(Original) |
Subject:
Management of Health Services
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
